Jump to content
Find Professionals    Deals    Get Quotations   Portfolios

JudgeDredd

Members
  • Content Count

    26
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

0 Neutral

About JudgeDredd

  • Rank
    Bronze Member

Previous Fields

  • Gender
    Male
  1. Let's celebrate SG50 by removing such pests from our society! http://www.channelnewsasia.com/mobile/business/case-takes-furniture/2032996.html
  2. 天网灰灰 疏而不漏 Sooner or later, the law will catch up with you!
  3. The Chinese 10 Courts of **** ******** is the place where humans will be brought to after they had died. Typically, according to believes based on legends, COW HEAD (牛头Niutou) and HORSE FACE (马面Mamian) will be the ones who will bring you down! What are the 10 Courts of ****?The below will be a basic introductions to the 10 courts of ****. The Crime that you have committed and the punishment that you will get. First Court of **** Crime: Violating the code of filial piety Punishment: Put under heavy slabs and boulders or squeezed in the middle of the grinder Second Court of **** Crime: Gossiping, Stealing, Wickedness Punishment: Having your tongue pierced, Made to kneel on steel granules, Boiled in a cauldron, disemboweled, and put in a volcanic chamber Third Court of **** Crime : Corruption and greed, Disobedience and disrespect to elders, Violating and state a Confucian principles or being an unjust official Punishment : Handcuffed and beaten, Have your ribs pierced, body grilled, your lungs, heart, liver, intestines and eyes torn out, Have your heart removed, knees crushed and face scraped by a mental instrument Fourth Court of **** Crime : General Sins, Cheating or evading income taxes, Stealing, Breaking promises Punishment : Hurled into a torrential river, made to kneel on bamboo spikes, boiled in oil, head struck open, Drowned under a heavy stone ,Have your hands swan off, have your lips split Fifth Court of **** Crime : Cruelty to animals and friends Punishment :Have your heart torn out with hooks or thrown onto protruding swords In this Sixth Court of ****, those who have already been punished but are still unrepentant, are punished further. This includes all crimes against any deity or Buddha or breaking any Buddhist or Confucian laws. Sixth Court of **** Crime : Stealing from temples committing blasphemy , Killing animals Punishment : Made to kneel on iron nails, swanned in two, gnawed by rats,Have your body chopped in half Seventh Court of **** Crime : Rebelling against authorities , Spreading false rumors , Using drugs, causing quarrels Punishment : Torn apart by dogs, Have your tongue pulled out , Thrown into a pot of boiling water Eighth Court of **** Crime : Committing crimes against Confucianism and operating houses for immoral purposes Punishment : Crushed under carriage wheels, sliced, disemboweled, struck by lighting, and having tongues, arms and legs cut off Ninth Court of **** Crime : Smuggling, committing arson , Writing or painting erotic literature or scenes Punishment :Attacked by snakes, stung by bees, tortured or trafficking drugs in boiling oil Flattened between two planks, have your head crushed in an iron ring, skull steamed, bones scraped and tendons pulled out In the Tenth Court of ****, the President passes his final judgment and the sinner goes through one of the seven-ways in the Wheel of Reincarnation. Shaped like a wheel, wind and clouds billow out from the circle in the centre and the six other circles surrounding it. Depending on the sinner's past life, he will enter a particular way which will determine how he or she will be reborn. Tenth Court of **** .....
  4. THE SADDEST THING ABOUT BETRAYAL IS THAT IT NEVER COMES FROM YOUR ENEMIES. IT COMES FROM FRIENDS AND LOVED ONES. INSIDERS HELP BUST CRIME
  5. https://youtu.be/IrslL7Rec6w A day in jail. It isn't nice! So make sure you don't get in!
  6. http://statutes.agc.gov.sg/aol/search/display/view.w3p;ident=bffe7cbf-b039-47e9-9614-11145a289d26;page=0;query=DocId%3A%22025e7646-947b-462c-b557-60aa55dc7b42%22%20Status%3Ainforce%20Depth%3A0;rec=0#P4XVII-P4_415-. The sections in the above link are reproduced below for your understanding and reading pleasure: PENAL CODE(CHAPTER 224)(Original Enactment: Ordinance 4 of 1871) REVISED EDITION 2008(30th November 2008)CheatingCheating415. Whoever, by deceiving any person, whether or not such deception was the sole or main inducement, fraudulently or dishonestly induces the person so deceived to deliver any property to any person, or to consent that any person shall retain any property, or intentionally induces the person so deceived to do or omit to do anything which he would not do or omit to do if he were not so deceived, and which act or omission causes or is likely to cause damage or harm to any person in body, mind, reputation or property, is said to “cheat”.[51/2007]Explanation 1.—A dishonest concealment of facts is a deception within the meaning of this section.Explanation 2.—Mere breach of contract is not of itself proof of an original fraudulent intent.Explanation 3.—Whoever makes a representation through any agent is to be treated as having made the representation himself.[51/2007]Illustrations(a)A, by falsely pretending to be in the Government service, intentionally deceives Z, and thus dishonestly induces Z to let him have on credit goods for which he does not mean to pay. A cheats.(b)A, by putting a counterfeit mark on an article, intentionally deceives Z into a belief that this article was made by a certain celebrated manufacturer, and thus dishonestly induces Z to buy and pay for the article. A cheats.(c)A, by exhibiting to Z a false sample of an article, intentionally deceives Z into believing that the article corresponds with the sample, and thereby dishonestly induces Z to buy and pay for the article. A cheats.(d)A, by tendering in payment for an article a bill on a house with which A keeps no money, and by which A expects that the bill will be dishonoured, intentionally deceives Z, and thereby dishonestly induces Z to deliver the article, intending not to pay for it. A cheats.(e)A, by pledging as diamonds articles which he knows are not diamonds, intentionally deceives Z, and thereby dishonestly induces Z to lend money. A cheats.(f)A intentionally deceives Z into a belief that A means to repay any money that Z may lend to him, and thereby dishonestly induces Z to lend him money, A not intending to repay it. A cheats.(g)A intentionally deceives Z into a belief that A means to deliver to Z a certain quantity of pepper which he does not intend to deliver, and thereby dishonestly induces Z to advance money upon the faith of such delivery. A cheats; but if A, at the time of obtaining the money, intends to deliver the pepper, and afterwards breaks his contract and does not deliver it, he does not cheat, but is liable only to a civil action for breach of contract.(h)A intentionally deceives Z into a belief that A has performed A’s part of a contract made with Z, which he has not performed, and thereby dishonestly inducesZ to pay money. A cheats.(i)A sells and conveys an estate to B. A, knowing that in consequence of such sale he has no right to the property, sells or mortgages the same to Z without disclosing the fact of the previous sale and conveyance to B, and receives the purchase or mortgage money from Z. A cheats.(j)A, playing with false dice, or marked cards, wins money from B. A cheats.[indian PC 1860, s. 415]Cheating by personation416. A person is said to “cheat by personation”, if he cheats by pretending to be some other person, or by knowingly substituting one person for another, or representing that he or any other person is a person other than he or such other person really is.Explanation .—The offence is committed whether the individual personated is a real or an imaginary person.Illustrations(a)A cheats by pretending to be a certain rich banker of the same name. A cheats by personation.(b)A cheats by pretending to be B, a person who is deceased. A cheats by personation.[indian PC 1860, s. 416]Punishment for cheating417. Whoever cheats shall be punished with imprisonment for a term which may extend to 3 years, or with fine, or with both.[51/2007][indian PC 1860, s. 417]Cheating with knowledge that wrongful loss may be thereby caused to a person whose interest the offender is bound to protect418. Whoever cheats with the knowledge that he is likely thereby to cause wrongful loss to a person whose interest, in the transaction to which the cheating relates, he was bound either by law or by a legal contract to protect shall be punished with imprisonment for a term which may extend to 5 years, or with fine, or with both.[51/2007][indian PC 1860, s. 418]Punishment for cheating by personation419. Whoever cheats by personation shall be punished with imprisonment for a term which may extend to 5 years, or with fine, or with both.[51/2007][indian PC 1860, s. 419]Cheating and dishonestly inducing a delivery of property420. Whoever cheats and thereby dishonestly induces the person deceived to deliver any property to any person, or to make, alter or destroy the whole or any part of a valuable security, or anything which is signed or sealed, and which is capable of being converted into a valuable security, shall be punished with imprisonment for a term which may extend to 10 years, and shall also be liable to fine.[51/2007][indian PC 1860, s. 420]
  7. Ang Mo Kio Police Division. You can go to any police station near your home to lodge the report. The important thing is to put in Pierce/Yiren's NRIC number into your report and then request the police officer to transfer the police report to Ang Mo Kio Police Division to follow-up (just to make sure). Many of the victims' police reports from all over the island (Singapore) have been moving (transferred to) to Ang Mo Kio Police Division lately.
  8. We are pursuing this case now! All victims are to report police and put Pierce/Yiren's IC number into your report and then request your report to be transferred to Ang Mo Kio police station.
  9. http://www.ag.ny.gov/press-release/lawsuit-accuses-furniture-retailer-fraud Lawsuit Accuses Furniture Retailer Of Fraud Attorney General Spitzer today announced a lawsuit against a Capital Region discount furniture store accused of unscrupulous business practices and a persistent pattern of broken promises to customers. Economy Furniture, Inc. - based in Schenectady - is accused of fraud, deceptive business practices and repeated violations of a state consumer protection law regulating merchandise delivery. "My office has received dozens of consumer complaints against Economy Furniture," Spitzer said. "Despite repeated customer problems and extensive mediation efforts, the company has refused to reform its business practices." In the past three years, Spitzer's office has received approximately 80 complaints against Economy Furniture. The lawsuit alleges that Economy Furniture repeatedly failed to give estimated delivery dates to customers ordering furniture - as required by state law. In the instances when the company provided a delivery date, consumers consistently experienced extended delays and numerous excuses before finally receiving their merchandise. Some consumers were left waiting at home all day for delivery only to learn of cancellation after having taken time off from work. Customers who ordered furniture and arranged to pick it up themselves found that, on the pre-arranged pick-up date, their merchandise was out of stock or otherwise unavailable. Economy Furniture often refused to provide refunds to consumers who attempted to cancel their orders because of extended delays - another violation of the state general business law. Spitzer's lawsuit also alleges that Economy Furniture induced customers to make purchases based on representations that the items were warranted for 30 days. Not until after consumers paid and furniture was delivered did they discover it was damaged. Requests for repairs were met with more excuses and delays and, when the company finally did make the repair, it attempted to charge for a service that should have been covered by the warranty. Spitzer's office filed the lawsuit to put a stop to the unlawful, deceptive and unscrupulous business practices of Economy Furniture. Although the company has resolved many complaints through the Attorney General's mediation program, it has failed to reform its business practices and continues to victimize consumers throughout the region. Spitzer's lawsuit seeks a court order barring the company from future violations of consumer protection laws, restitution for any customers harmed by Economy Furniture business practices, civil penalties, and court costs. Individuals with complaints against Economy Furniture are encouraged to contact the Attorney General's consumer help line at (800) 771-7755. This case is being handled by Assistant Attorney General Matthew Barbaro of the Consumer Frauds and Protection Bureau. http://www.ag.ny.gov/press-release/lawsuit-accuses-furniture-retailer-fraud
  10. Sentencing in Cheating Offenceshttp://www.lawgazette.com.sg/2000-8/Aug00-focus3.htm
  11. Unfair sale practices, cooling periods, and the right to cancel contracts – Consumer Protection (Fair Trading) Acthttp://singaporelegaladvice.com/unfair-sale-practices-cooling-periods-right-cancel-contracts-consumer-protection-fair-trading-act/ The Consumer Protection (Fair Trading) Act (the “Act”) is a law protecting consumers in Singapore. The Act applies to most consumer transactions, but does not apply to sales of land and houses, employment contracts, and pawnbroking. The Act was formulated primarily to protect consumers against unfair practices and to give consumers additional rights in respect of goods that do not conform to contract. Suing the supplier for unfair practicesWhat is an unfair practice? A consumer who has entered into a consumer transaction involving an unfair practice can sue the supplier to obtain a refund, in addition to other remedies the court may order. However, the right to commence an action for unfair practice does not apply where the size of the monetary compensation sought by the consumer exceeds S$30,000 (see section 6(2) of the Act). An unfair practice is defined in section 4 of the Act: Meaning of unfair practice 4. It is an unfair practice for a supplier, in relation to a consumer transaction — (a) to do or say anything, or omit to do or say anything, if as a result a consumer might reasonably be deceived or misled; (b) to make a false claim; © to take advantage of a consumer if the supplier knows or ought reasonably to know that the consumer — (i) is not in a position to protect his own interests; or (ii) is not reasonably able to understand the character, nature, language or effect of the transaction or any matter related to the transaction; or (d) without limiting the generality of paragraphs (a), (b) and ©, to do anything specified in the Second Schedule. Examples of unfair practices Please refer to the Second Schedule of the Act for a list of examples of unfair practices. How to sue for unfair practices? A consumer must commence legal action within 2 years (section 12(1) of the Act describes how the time limit is calculated). A consumer can sue for unfair practices in the Small Claims Tribunal (SCT) subject to certain restrictions (see section 7 of the Act). Among others, the SCT can hear claims involving contracts for the sale of goods or the provision of services, contracts for the lease of residential premises that does not exceed 2 years, but not a hire-purchase agreements or contracts for the sale of immovable property. In an action in the SCT, lawyer representation is not permitted – the parties present their cases before a Registrar without lawyer representation, thereby saving on lawyer fees. If you are unsure whether the SCT can hear your claim, please contact the SCT to verify the fact. Alternatively, if the SCT does not have the jurisdiction to hear your claim, you can also commence a civil suit in the State Courts or the High Court to advance your claim. Lawyer representation is advisable due to the more complex civil procedures involved in a civil action. What remedies can the Small Claims Tribunal award to the consumer? Generally, the SCT can: Order the supplier to pay money to the consumer; Make a work order (to rectify the defects or replace defective parts); or Make other ancillary orders.(See section 35 of the Small Claims Tribunal Act). SECOND SCHEDULESection 4(d)SPECIFIC UNFAIR PRACTICES1. Representing that goods or services have sponsorship, approval, performance characteristics, accessories, ingredients, components, qualities, uses or benefits that they do not have.2. Representing that goods or services are of a particular standard, quality, grade, style, model, origin or method of manufacture if they are not.3. Representing that goods are new or unused if they are not or if they have deteriorated or been altered, reconditioned or reclaimed.4. Representing that goods have been used to an extent different from the fact or that they have a particular history or use if the supplier knows it is not so.5. Representing that goods or services are available or are available for a particular reason, for a particular price, in particular quantities or at a particular time if the supplier knows or can reasonably be expected to know it is not so, unless the representation clearly states any limitation.6. Representing that a service, part, repair or replacement is needed or desirable if that is not so, or that a service has been provided, a part has been installed, a repair has been made or a replacement has been provided, if that is not so.7. Representing that a price benefit or advantage exists respecting goods or services where the price benefit or advantage does not exist.8. Charging a price for goods or services that is substantially higher than an estimate provided to the consumer, except where the consumer has expressly agreed to the higher price in advance.9. Representing that a transaction involving goods or services involves or does not involve rights, remedies or obligations where that representation is deceptive or misleading.10. Representing that a person has or does not have the authority to negotiate the final terms of an agreement involving goods or services if the representation is different from the fact.11. Taking advantage of a consumer by including in an agreement terms or conditions that are harsh, oppressive or excessively one-sided so as to be unconscionable. See the whole list of examples here:http://statutes.agc.gov.sg/aol/search/display/view.w3p;ident=a12b73cc-955b-4cc6-b67f-777f7b6028c2;page=0;query=DocId%3A%22403774c5-3764-4c57-bf79-ceb0a3b5ba5d%22%20Status%3Ainforce%20Depth%3A0;rec=0#Sc2-.
×